DESIGNER MOCKUP · amparolawfirm.com homepage · brand tokens locked · placeholder photography
NYC has aggressive traffic regulations under the Vision Zero initiative — speed limits (25 mph default), turn restrictions, daylight enforcement, automated enforcement. A driver’s violation of any of these regulations is often direct evidence of negligence.
Pedestrian cases must meet the serious injury threshold to recover for pain and suffering. Most pedestrian strike injuries clearly meet the threshold (fracture, significant disfigurement, permanent loss of function, etc.). The threshold question is rarely a barrier in serious pedestrian cases.
New York is a pure comparative negligence state. Even if the pedestrian was partially responsible (jaywalking, distracted), recovery is reduced but not eliminated.
Pedestrian cases in NYC sometimes involve federal claims when the defendant is a federal government vehicle, when a federal regulatory question is implicated, or when the case is removed for some reason. More commonly, the federal-court discipline shows up in motion practice, expert workups, and the rigor with which the medical record is built. Bob Amirian’s federal training shapes how the case is developed even when it stays in state court.
Same categories. Pedestrian cases involving severe injuries typically generate substantial damages.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.