DESIGNER MOCKUP · amparolawfirm.com homepage · brand tokens locked · placeholder photography
12 NYCRR 23-4 — “Excavation operations” — addresses excavation safety in detail. Subsections: 23-4.2 (trench and area-type excavations — sloping, shoring, benching based on depth and soil type), 23-4.3 (driven steel sheet piling), 23-4.4 (excavations adjoining buildings), 23-4.5 (wood sheeting and bracing). The Industrial Code’s specific requirements for trench protection for trenches over 5 feet deep are concrete, well-defined obligations.
Where the GC or owner had notice of unsafe excavation practices.
When a worker falls into a trench from height, or is struck by something falling into the trench.
Liability: property owner, general contractor, excavation subcontractor, engineer of record (particularly geotechnical or excavation support engineer), shoring/sheeting supplier, equipment operators and lessors, adjacent property owners in lateral support failure cases.
Injuries: crush injuries to chest/abdomen/pelvis, asphyxiation with neurological consequences, spinal cord injuries, traumatic brain injury, fractures, internal organ injuries, compartment syndrome from prolonged crushing, and death. The mortality rate in fully buried trench collapses is extremely high.
Same damages categories. Trench collapse cases often involve substantial damages because of the catastrophic injuries.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Trench cases turn on documents that exist on every project: the excavation permit, soils report, excavation support drawings, daily inspection logs, OSHA citation history, and excavation subcontract. Jordan recognizes when an excavation contractor cut corners on shoring, when the soils report described conditions requiring more protection than was provided, and when daily inspections were paper-only.
In a typical negligence case, the defense will argue your case down with comparative-fault arguments — that you weren’t paying attention, that you took a shortcut, that you should have known better. Under §240, those arguments generally cannot defeat the claim. That is why §240 cases tend to settle higher and earlier than negligence-only construction cases.